I had dinner w/a friend the other night who is sort of an auntie and guitar mentor for me.
I’ve been a bit perplexed…. a lot of times things that seem logical to me, don’t get through to others
and it’s based on my approach:
My approach to people is automatic… it’s a finely tuned gut reaction… minus the gurgles.
My approach when meeting a person is to find the common ground.
I didn’t actively think of this as a reason to start off with… before common ground-finding was
a conscious intention of mine… I did it as a coping mechanism or a way to excuse a person from
bad behavior.
Now, I view it as…. when you find something that relates with someone else and decide this is what you
have in common…. you’ve invested. You’ve cared. You’ve made an effort to seek a level of moving
forward or through. You’re acknowledging this person as a part of you. You are now connected.
Feeling you’re connected to a person, is important in knowing who you are in the big scheme of things.
The difference between someone like me… and say, like someone on a religious mission… is that I seek the
connections and the ways we relate that already exist. Evangelism is trying to create a connection that doesn’t
already exist. It’s very different. This was pointed out to me… and I appreciate it, because now I understand
just another reason why sometimes I will butt-heads with someone who has a different approach.
So, which one is easier? Finding the common thread or creating the common thread? Is it easier to get someone to do what you do or is it easier to find something that we both already do and respect each other for all the other things we do different?
It’s so much easier to love someone for who they are, rather than conditionally love someone based on what you want them to do and who you want them to be.


